Film Review: Life Begins In College

 "Life Begins In College"

 *** (out of ****)

Although forever unfavorably compared to another sibling comedy team - the Marx Brothers - the comedy trio of the Ritz Brothers were by no means a poor man's imitation of the more celebrated comedy offspring threesome. 

Much like the Marx Brothers, the brothers Ritz (Harry, Jimmy, and Al) found success on the vaudeville circuit prior to finding their way on the big screen. With an act built around singing and dancing to novelty songs, the brothers would begin their movie careers playing comic relief in many 20th Century Fox musicals, making their feature length movie debut in the Alice Faye picture, "Sing, Baby, Sing" (1936). As their popularity grew, the boys were given the opportunity to headline in their own vehicle, a college campus setting comedy, "Life Begins in College" (1937), perhaps a reference to the popular expression at the time, life begins at forty.

The college setting wasn't anything new for the Ritz Brothers since one of their earliest acts was called The Collegians, which may explain the choice for this to be their first headlining effort. And while "Life Begins in College" is referred to as "starring" the Ritz Brothers, in all honesty the situation isn't so far removed from the musicals they appeared in prior to starring Sonja Henie and Alice Faye. The brothers are still comedy relief to a love story.

Depending upon your perspective, that may make "Life Begins in College" slightly disappointing. The brothers aren't really the driving force behind the plot. The premise largely concerns itself with Lombardy College's star football quarterback, Bob Hayner (Dick Baldwin) and his attempts to court the coach's daughter, Janet (Gloria Stuart, best known for a role she would play 60 years later in "Titanic" (1997) as the old lady). The situation becomes tricky for Bob when the college tries to force Coach O' Hara (Fred Stone) out and replace him with a younger man. In an attempt to win favor with Janet, Bob claims the college will changed its mind. All of sudden, wouldn't you know it, Janet quickly warms up to Bob, after a rather chilly introduction between the two.

Further complicating Bob's life is a new student, Little Black Cloud (Nat Pendleton), the college's first Native American enrollee, despite the school allegedly being founded as an institution meant for the higher educational advancement of Native Americans (!). Little Black Cloud tries out for the football team as a quarterback, as a type of retribution for a prank Bob and his friends pulled on him. Janet was caught in the middle of it, causing her and Bob's initial friction.

Harry, Jimmy, and Al are also students at the college, working their way through school by running the Klassy Kampus Kleaners. Proving to be inept at their jobs they screw up the only customer order they have ever received, a request for a tailored made suit. Being the outsiders they are, the boys befriend Little Black Cloud - of course only after they con him out of $100 - by inviting him to join their fraternity, which the brothers are currently the only members of.

It is soon revealed Little Black Cloud is very wealthy - his tribe's land produces oil - but wants to keep his finances a secret. He wants to be liked for who he is and not for his money. However, he wonders if a large donation might change the school's mind about Coach O'Hara. The brothers decide they will make the donation to the school in their name, allowing everyone on campus to believe they are rich.

Already we can see "Life Begins in College" will ever so mildly touch upon discrimination between whites and Native Americans, while engaging in stereotypes itself. The movie will also be a commentary on the corrupt nature of colleges and the influence donations can have. Not only does the school agree to keep Coach O'Hara but the brothers get the college dean to force the coach to allow them to play on the school's football team. This fits into a running motif among the characters that they only begin to act nice to one another after they discover what someone can do for them - Janet and Bob, the brothers and Little Black Cloud, the school's dean and the brothers....etc. 

The college setting with its sports activities has usually provided ample comedic possibilities for comedians - Harold Lloyd in the silent comedy, "The Freshman" (1925), the Marx Brothers in "Horse Feathers" (1932) - and so it is for the Ritz Brothers. One of the gags being while the coach must allow the boys to play, he only does so during the last two minutes of each game. By this point in time Lombardy's lead is so commanding even the fumbles of the Ritz Brothers can't jeopardize the outcome. In one scene, as the Ritz Brothers make their way to the field, one of the scorekeepers begins to award points to the other team. When the second scorekeeper points out, there hasn't been any score yet, he's told, there will be, the Ritz Brothers are just going in.

But my favorite sequence with the boys may be a song and dance they do just before the big game. Dressed as the famous paining, the Spirit of '76, it is meant as a kind of pep rally invoking patriot pride that goes into a medley of tunes from Yankee Doodle Dandy to the Merry-Go-Round Broke Down.

One glaring flaw of the movie is none of these actors look young enough to play college students. For example, by the time this movie was released Nat Pendleton was 42 years old. Between the brothers, Harry was the youngest, at a mere 30 years old. Gloria Stewart and Dick Baldwin were the youngest actors of the main cast, respectively 27 and 26.

Perhaps one of the main reasons the Ritz Brothers and their shenanigans are completely forgotten today may be because younger, college aged audiences - whom I do not recommend this movie to - will view the brothers' humor as corny and dated. As will more intelligent adults, if we are being honest. Take for example the first song and song routine in the movie to showcase the brothers, a Latin inspired number with Harry Ritz dressed as a woman. It takes great talent to dance in unison as the brothers do but that talent will take second place for those who won't be able to get pass the broad comedic antics of the boys, in particular Harry, with his rubber face and wild exaggerated cliché homosexual gestures. The team almost seems to be breaking the cardinal rule of comedy, don't act silly just for the sake of being silly. And yet I find their behavior amusing. Than again, I also find it funny when someone slips on a banana peel or has a pie smashed in their face.

 

Younger more politically motivated viewers may be offended by the movie and offer the tiresome tripe, the movie doesn't reflect the values of today. In another song and dance routine the Ritz Brothers dress in Native American costumes to sing a song. I can just hear the liberal hysteria about insensitivity. Granted you wouldn't find this in a movie today but why lean into these issues and make everything so divisive?! Harry's singing in drag may be another issue for activists. I'm sure some they will interpret this as some kind of attack on transgenderism or the concept of gender fluidity - what's so funny about a man dressed as a woman! God help these poor kids if they ever discover Bob Hope or Milton Berle!

Of course what these viewers are (purposely) missing out on is the positive liberal - yes liberal! - messaging of "Life Begins in College". The white man and the Native American do become friends. There is respect between them for each man's athletic ability. A white female student (the funny and sadly forgotten Joan Davis) is even attracted to Little Black Cloud, completely unphased by their cultural differences. Compare this attitude and acceptance to the one presented in the Eddie Cantor comedy / musical, "Whoopee!" (1930), which also dealt with white and Native American characters. There the white woman could have only dated the Native American after finding out he had "white blood". This time around it isn't even presented as an issue of how white society would react to them being together. This is to say nothing of the commentary on the negative influence of money.

And still I wouldn't call "Life Begins in College" a great comedy or even a great Ritz Brothers comedy. Too much of the movie doesn't focus on the brothers. They are kind of a side show attraction, popping up every now and then with humorous musicals numbers to perform. While the songs are fun to listen to, it isn't side-splittingly funny. The best Ritz Brothers comedies were the ones that focused a bit more on them like "Straight, Place and Show" (1938) and "The Three Musketeers" (1939), often thought of as their best. Heck, I'll even take them in the horror / comedy movie, "The Gorilla" (1939) which has been universally panned.

It may seem odd to some for me to include the Ritz Brothers in my "year of me" celebration - a year long tribute to my favorite artists in honor of my 40th birthday and the 15th anniversary of this blog - but I've known of the trio since I was a child and first saw them, appropriately enough, in their big screen debut, a two reeler comedy, "Hotel Anchovy" (1934). Even as a child I initially thought, what are these guys, a knockoff of the Marx Brothers? Each brother seemed to cancel the other one out as all three of them were engaged in silly antics. There wasn't the typical straight man / comedian set-up. You would be forgiven for not knowing which brother was Harry, Al, or Jimmy. Still there was enough comic anarchy to keep me interested. That more than anything appealed to my sensibilities, even at a young age. Proving I never stood a chance of becoming a real life normal boy. Pinocchio had better odds. I was inundated with the comedy of the Marx Brothers, Olsen & Johnson, Ernie Kovacs, and the Ritz Brothers before I was old enough to go to school. It left a lasting impression on me and only continued to grow into a love for Mel Brooks comedies, "Airplane!" (1980), and the "Naked Gun" (1988).

Of the three brothers Harry was the standout, considered to be the only one that possessed any comedic ability. It has been implied Harry was offered a solo contract but refused to break up the act, leaving his brothers behind. What some viewers may not realize however is Harry Ritz inspired many of the great comedians that followed him - Mel Brooks, Sid Caesar, Jerry Lewis, and Danny Kaye among them. Brooks even went as far as to call Harry Ritz the "funniest man ever".

If you've never seen a Ritz Brothers comedy, I'm not convinced this is the best place to start. On the other hand, since they aren't the stars of the movie, you will only see them on-screen when they have something funny to do. "Life Begins in College" only works because of the brothers and some funny moments with Joan Davis. This is what makes the movie worth watching. The Ritz Brothers deserve a place in the history of comedy, if for no other reason than the influence their work hand on those that changed the landscape of comedy. The brothers were talented though and should not be forgotten. "Life Begins in College" provides some glimpses of what made them so special.

Film Review: The Christmas Toy

 "The Christmas Toy"

*** (out of ****)

Do children have a universal suspicion that when they leave their bedrooms, their toys come to life? What exactly would their toys be up to, if they did come to life? Director Eric Till and renowned puppeteer Jim Henson explore such a scenario in the 1980s television Christmas movie, "The Christmas Toy" (1986).

It is Christmas Eve in the Jones house. The children -  Jamie (Marsha Moreau) and brother Jesse (Zachary Bennett) - head off to bed, in eager anticipation of Santa's arrival and all the new toys he will bring them. The wise old Teddy Bear in the playroom however needs to remind the toys of what Christmas means for them. Not only the presence of new toys but the sad consequence that some toys may be disregarded and no longer a child's "favorite toy".

The two toys considered Jamie's favorites are Apple (voiced by Kathryn Mullen) - a kind of cross between Kid Sister and a Cabbage Patch doll - and Rugby (voiced by Dave Goelz) - a stuffed animal tiger. Rugby was the favorite toy last Christmas, replacing Apple. That Christmas, the happiest day of Rugby's life, was the saddest day of Apple's. Apple understands the concept each Christmas the children receive new toys, Rugby however believes each Christmas repeats itself and he will always be wrapped up and opened each year by Jamie, thus remaining forever her favorite toy. Rugby must find a way to get back under the Christmas tree and wrapped up. He leaves the playroom, putting his own life in danger, as well as the other toys that try to rescue him. You see, in the toy world, if a toy is found by a human. and not in the last place the human left them, the toy becomes "frozen", never coming to life again when humans aren't around.

After Rugby makes his way to the Christmas tree, he realizes there is no empty box waiting for him. Instead he opens another box, with a different toy inside, that immediately comes to life. Meteora (voiced by Camille Bonora), a kind of futuristic She-Ra action figure, doesn't realize she is a toy but has landed on another planet. This crushes Rugby, who has come to the realization he too will be "replaced" and most likely Meteora will become the new favorite. Somehow Rugby, Apple, and the rest of the toys, must convince Meteora to go back in the box to be opened by Jamie in the morning.

Through this experience the toys, Rugby in particular, come to learn valuable lessons in friendship, love, and acceptance. The toys will always be loved and around for a child to play with. No toy is really forgotten.

Of course many viewers will notice similarities between this movie and the Disney / Pixar animated movie, "Toy Story" (1995). Obviously "Toy Story" stole, er, I mean was inspired by "The Christmas Toy". There are too many connections for it all to be a mere coincidence. "Toy Story" is the better movie however if for no other reason the running time of the movie allows more opportunity to flesh out its story and create characters that become enduring to the audience. None of the characters in "The Christmas Toy" - with a 50 minute running time - are memorable and made a positive impression on me.

Rugby is going to be the character to go through the biggest arc, becoming a different character than at the start of the movie. There are times I found the character insufferable. Even after the lesson is learned, Rugby wasn't lovable to me. I believe a lot of this was due to the constraints of the running time for a TV movie. A lot in Rugby's growth feels rushed. The conflict with Meteora, which should have been central to Rugby's development, ends too abruptly. It also gets side tracked by Meteora's delusions, which could have inspired a lot more comedic possibilities, as we saw with Buzz  Lightyear in "Toy Story". The motivation for Meteora to return inside the box, felt out of character.

Apple is meant to serve as the movie's conscience, and fares better than Rugby on the annoying meter, but gosh does  Apple look slightly creepy. Appearances aside however, it is the supporting characters that are the most enjoyable to watch and provide most of the movie's humor. In addition to Apple, the best character in the movie is Mew (voiced by Steve Whitmire, the distinguished voice actor behind such famous Muppet characters as Ernie (of Bert & Ernie), Rizzo the Rat, and in later years Kermit the Frog). Mew is a cat toy, that isn't really recognized as a real toy by some of the other characters, Rugby included. For whatever reason, Mew wants to believe Rugby is his friend and is the first toy to go after him after he leaves the playroom, and remains by his side until the end. Mew will be the character children will get the most enjoyment watching.

I also must mention what an odd choice to make Rugby the lead character. Why on earth would a stuffed animal become a young girl's favorite toy? Especially when compared to the much more interesting toys she has. I should also mention, Jamie is about an 8 or 9 year old girl. Maybe its been too long since I was a child but stuffed animals never had much appeal for me. Although I admit as a child I did love my Popples doll. But I was younger than the Jamie character. 

Despite the word "Christmas" in its title, "The Christmas Toy" has not endured as a classic Christmas movie. Growing up I personally had no connection to it. Because it was a made-for-TV movie, it must have went unseen for years. In the days before DVDs and Blu-Rays, made-for-TV movies were usually not seen again after their initial TV airing. Although some years later - 1993 - this movie was released on VHS.

I would also be reluctant to call this movie a "Christmas movie", again, despite the appearance of the word "Christmas" in its title. However it does offer a nice message about togetherness that the best Christmas movies make a commentary on.

The real reason to watch "The Christmas Toy" is for the work done by Jim Henson's puppeteers. Despite a few slip ups here and there - the appearances of strings, and some shots of Mew - everyone does nice work. I wouldn't however say this ranks among Henson's best movies. "Labyrinth" (1986) - released in the same year - for example is for more impressive, just on the puppeteering work alone. And although it received mixed critical reviews, "The Dark Crystal" (1982) has some stunning moments. Even episodes of "Fraggle Rock" were far more exceptional. Because "The Christmas Toy" was produced on a smaller budget it can't really compete with these other Henson efforts.

I hate to sound too critical of "The Christmas Toy". It can be a pleasing and mildly amusing movie for children. Unless you are an adult that watched this as a child, I don't believe it has that universal appeal the best family movies do that can entertain both parents and children. Still this is a moderately entertaining movie considering the limitations of made-for-TV movies. Some years later this movie was spun off into a TV show, "The Secret Life of Toys", one year before "Toy Story" was released.