** 1/2 (out of ****)
Short films can be a wonderful tool for filmmakers to develop ideas, learn their craft, and be launching pads for feature-length films - in most cases the director's ultimate goal. This year's blog theme, Life is Short - my year long look at short films has given me the opportunity to watch several short films and with it being October, I've turned my eye towards horror films.
If there is one thing I dislike about short films it is that they are largely academic, textbook examples of filmmaking. Given the limited running time, they rely heavily upon symbolism and metaphor to tell their stories. Feature-length making does as well but in short films it is more compact and serves as a shorthand to introduce themes. If you aren't steep in your knowledge of symbolism, the average viewer will miss it.
I've selected two shorts; "There's Nothing There" (2023) and "The Knowing" (2023) that focus on similar themes of trauma and remorse and use many of the same symbols. That's what I meant by textbook examples. When I was studying film at Columbia College in Chicago, and made my own short films, I learned the same symbolism these filmmakers used and how to quickly get information across the screen. My eyes are able to zero in on it with lightening speed.
But I also chose these two short films for another reason. One was directed by a man - Alessandro Russotti and the other a woman - Erin Lovett. I thought it would be interesting to see how men and women examine similar themes. Both short films also center their stories on female characters, strengthening the comparison.
"There's Nothing There" - which can be seen on YouTube - literally begins with a woman (Maxine Denis) walking into her condo apartment, staring at herself in a mirror. Without knowing anything about the plot, I immediately knew this story was going to be psychological, revolving around inner emotional conflict. In film, a mirror is a symbol for duality, because it cast a reflection. That is what I meant by short hand to introduce themes. The film runs just under 15 minutes and within under a minute the director tips his hat to what kind of story this will be, if your eye catches the symbolism. Short films demand this type of economical storytelling. Practically every frame has a symbolic or metaphorical purpose.
As the woman (the credits call her Kate) stares at the mirror and her phone, a caption appears on screen stating an incoming call from Richard (voiced by Alex Gravenstein). Richard is either a husband or boyfriend who she lives with. He is out of town for work. Their first line of dialogue is about Kate's confusion regarding how Richard can call her because of his phone's poor reception. This is going to become another symbol for a poor line of communication between the couple. The dialogue feels a little awkward and we can sense Kate's uneasiness answering questions. Richard for example somehow knew Kate was out the previous night. She says she was with a friend, Danielle (Jessica Barbusci) celebrating her twenty-eight birthday but later in the conversation says the friend turned thirty. Clearly Kate is not telling the truth. During the conversation we see a pair of drinking glasses and Kate pours herself a glass of juice. In film school we are taught that glass can both symbolize truth and transparency as well as the fragility of life and relationships.
When the phone call with Richard ends, we are shown a flashback of the party Kate was at. After doing some shots she begins to dance by herself when a man approaches her from behind. His hands fondle her body as he kisses her neck. Kate doesn't make any attempt to move away and the two keep dancing. A messy bedsheet implies more than dancing went on between the two.That becomes the hook to Russotti's film. How much of what we are seeing is taking place inside Kate's mind? Did the door handle really move? Was the phone conversation real? Is everything a figment of Kate's imagination, representing something deeper?
The situation escalates when the man Kate was dancing with appears in the apartment, though we never see anyone enter through the door. His appearance causes the glass with Kate's juice to shatter and broken glass becomes another symbol. At this point in the story most viewers should grasp what is going on. Kate cheated on Richard at the party and now either that man is back or Kate's guilt and remorse over the incident is catching up with her; causing Kate to deal with her inner emotional conflict.
This doesn't seem to be an entirely new concept for Russotti. He appears to like to center his films around issues of morality, as seen in another work of his, "Street Walker" (2023). That film wasn't as academic and mechanical as "There's Nothing There" but I get the sense Russotti focuses on female characters because they are a trope in the suspense / horror genre - a la the damsel in distress - and not because of an interest in telling stories from a female perspective.
Nevertheless the actresses that do appear in his short films are quite talented. Maxine Denis has a great deal of talent and I am eager to see her in more mainstream productions. I've known, worked with, and reviewed amateur actresses, Denis is a step above. Her craft will grow as she appears in more of these short films. She already understands how to use her body to project emotion, create a presence on screen and engage an audience.Technically I can't fault the filmmaking and did like one sequence Russotti created when stops time and Kate is revisiting the party as an onlooker. Everyone but Kate and her friend are active and everyone else is frozen. It is a device we have seen in various Christmas Carol adaptations and even more recently in Francis Ford Coppola's "Megalopolis" (2024). It is a visually dynamic way to force the audience to pay attention to a specific detail.
"There's Nothing There" is a technically well-made short film but a bit too mechanical. There is no true emotion to what is going on. It has a formulaic, by the numbers sensibility to it. We aren't completely drawn to the lead character because we haven't been made to care about her enough. You can however see how "There's Nothing There" would be a sequence in a larger movie.
"The Knowing"The film utilizes a flashback format - which I found slightly confusing at times - to tell the story of Lea (Anna Wood), a freelance reporter and a glass artist dealing with the lost of a child as she takes a break from the world and her husband (Rafi Silver) by visiting a cabin in the woods.
Once again words aren't spoken but their implications are there. An artist creates. Creation is life. Life is contrasted with death. At the cabin Lea begins to have brief sightings of a dark mysterious figure. Is it her imagination? The Grim Reaper? A representation of her grief and trauma? The vision first occurs when she is working with red stained glass - signifying the same thing it did in "There Nothing There" - and looks through it. The figure is gone when Lea stares out with her naked eye but she instantly hears distant whispers.
During Lea's time in the cabin she is triggered into flashbacks highlighting her relationship with her husband. It ranges from his desire to become a father to the moment when she reveals she is pregnant. One powerful scene has the couple discuss the implications of Lea having a baby. The dialogue stresses the financial difficulty of raising a child as well as the sacrifices that a woman must make. Lea tells a story about her mother having to give up on her education in order to raise children.
This seems to be the thrust of what "The Knowing" is thematically hinting at. It is about the horror and trauma within that women experience. It isn't fully explored as well as it could be in a feature-length format but an addition story of a woman who had a "back alley" abortion suggests this is a story about women and motherhood, societal expectations of mothers, and the devastating consequences that can occur.

